I wasn't focused then, or rather not focused in the way I am now. I used to accept, at face value, the stories people told of themselves, or others. Well, perhaps not the most outrageous ones; I remember one young fey thing in Bloomington when I was just legal who loved to claim to be related to Dianne Von Furstenberg. And this sort of early Eighties affectation wasn't all that strange--Charles told me he'd met equally fey young things in ratty second hand clothes claiming to be the cast-offs of minor European royalty, Klein, or St. Laurent, or Lauren. There wasn't a smart phone with a data plan available in 1981 for instant fact checking. It was charming.
But if your story had plausibility and your manner in telling it seemed sincere, I was perfectly ready to believe it. So, of course, I swallowed some doosies.
My failures in spotting a whopper weren't born of strict innocence, but of a policy I consciously adopted to accept what people said as true and take responsibility for my own reactions to it. This, I thought, was the only course of action anyone could take without going utterly batshit crazy trying to protect against the inevitable scams and tales told throughout an ordinary life.
I shouldn't fail to say that I've told some doosies in my time too, as I suspect everyone has--you inflate your position in the Dickens novel of your last relationship. you recast yourself in Medieval France from Valois peasant to Joan of Arc, you claim the ancestry of Lincoln, your father or grandfather boned Marilyn when she was Norma Jean. Our personal histories are percentages of authenticity, with threads of family aprocrypha woven in, with aggrandizement leavened throughout, with subjectivity spanking the bare ass of objectivity with a boar bristle brush.
I recently posted a thread on my Facebook page about being a good person--admitting my own doubts of being one, or even or what truly defined goodness in a person. I have to say that the responses that I got from my friends were so beautifully considered, that I wanted to push that conversation further--but honestly, I doubt Facebook is really for that sort of exchange on a permanent basis.
I don't think my comments or the comments of my friends hashed out any revelations--except one that slapped me awake: a good person can only be identified by subjective criteria on a personal level. Seriously. Even Mother Theresa has detractors, there is no one I can think of who has been universally named a good person (sorry, Jesus doesn't count--and there's the pesky fact that not everyone believes there was a Jesus, or if such a person existed, that he wasn't as dedicated to bringing the sword as the palm branch).
I admit, the topic is an item born of my own self fascinations during the past year. It's about wrestling with mortality, but it's also about what type of reality to create as I move forward. I haven't been all about dying this year, I've also wondered a great deal about what I would be given a second chance to be. Would I follow the dictums of a goodness that demands a meekness to the vissiscitudes of fate, a kiss blower to the buzzkills of a peaceful life? Would I refuse to go quietly? Is being good a product of good works?
I think it's all that and more--but ojectively, I can only say that being a good person is above all not something you call yourself--it's a quality that others identify in you. That which one would wish to emulate, easy or not to do.
If there's anything I could have from PCB, it's more of this conversation. I encourage anyone who reads this to post a comment about what constitutes a good person in your estimation; what qualities, which acts, what combination, or if you hold no such objectivity and simply identify on the fly, or, know it when you see it.
It's 7:34am. I think I need a nap. Today, a good person might be the one who mows the yard, or plants the purple hyacinth beans, or cleans his bedroom because we will soon have a guest here...subjective, indeed.
This was my original posting:
I'm trying to puzzle out if I'm a good person, but a proper answer depends upon what a good person actually is--
Is it doing good deeds for others with no expectation?
Is it the implied benign neglect of doing no harm?
Is it that no one has complaint of you and does that ever happen?
Is it a conscious forgiving of the self for one's own flaws? Or a fulsome forgiving of the flaws of others?
I find I don't know. I tend to think it's part of all of those things and part of something I haven't even listed...
Thoughts?
Is it doing good deeds for others with no expectation?
Is it the implied benign neglect of doing no harm?
Is it that no one has complaint of you and does that ever happen?
Is it a conscious forgiving of the self for one's own flaws? Or a fulsome forgiving of the flaws of others?
I find I don't know. I tend to think it's part of all of those things and part of something I haven't even listed...
Thoughts?
Following are the responses to the post which I enjoyed immensely. I've redacted the names of the orginal poster as I didn't ask permissioin to directly attribute the words to them--but even anonymously, I find them of great value:
No comments:
Post a Comment